Alternative Heating Home
Wood Pellet and Corn Stoves
Small Space Heaters
Alternative Cooling
Corn Furnaces and  Boilers
Fireplace Inserts
Fuel Comparison Chart
Grain and Multi Fuel Stoves
High Efficiency Boilers
Masonry Heaters
Outdoor Corn Boilers
Outdoor Wood Boilers
Portable Generators
Radiant Heating
Solar Energy for Homes
Solar Heating Systems
Winterize Your Home
Wind Power
Wood Stoves and Firewood
BioBrick Heat Content vs Firewood
< Wood Stoves - Firewood                     
What got my attention was the 21% figure they offered as the typical
moisture content of cordwood. Any homeowner heating with wood knows
that firewood isn't considered seasoned unless the moisture content is 15%
or less.

Maybe the 6 points separating the two examples doesn't sound like much,
but wood with 21% moisture content is actually 40% wetter than the 15%

I don't think the BioBrick people were trying to intentionally mislead
consumers. It just sounds better from a marketing stand point to say one
pallet of BioBricks delivers the same amount of heat as cordwood with 21%
moisture content rather than a pallet of BioBricks delivers 94% of the heat of
properly seasoned cordwood.

But what happens when you compare the heat output of BioBricks with well
seasoned, 12% moisture cordwood?

For comparison purposes I'm going to use the B
TU heat numbers from a
table of
Firewood Heat and Weight Values put together by the California
Energy Commission. The table lists the weight and B
TU values of 39 types of
firewood at 12% moisture content.

However, a cord of firewood rarely consists of only one species which makes
it difficult to accurately determine the B
TU value. In order to even things out,
I'll compare the heat value of BioBricks to Ash. Ash is a middle of the road
hardwood and, heat wise, is halfway between Live Oak and Western Red

The heat value for a cord of 12% moisture Ash is 25 million B
TUs at an
average weight of 3,000 pounds. This works out to 8,333 Btu's per pound.

The manufacture
r's heat estimate for one, two pound BioBrick is 17,000
TUs, or 8,500 BTUs per pound – almost identical to Ash. (By the way, I
picked Ash first and ran the numbers, not the other way around).

Although my methods are hardly scientific, I think it would be fair to say the
heat output of BioBricks closely approximates that of most firewood.
While reading the
homepage of the
website, I noticed an
interesting statistic used to
describe the heat content
of BioBricks.

Here's the heat claim
quoted from their website:

"One pallet of our
BioBricks(TM) brings as
much heat into your house
as one cord of wood*."

*(typical cordwood
moisture content of 21%)